Notification – no appeals of Decision No. 54/2018 of IQC for the subject of re-evaluation Mr. Medi Bici
Decision No. 54/2018 Click here
Decision No. 54/2018 Click here
14 September 2018
The Public Commissioner appealed to the Appeal Chamber against the decision No. 60/2018, of the Independent Qualification Commission for the confirmation in duty of the re-evaluation subject, Mr. Gentian Medja, magistrate/judge at the First Instance Administrative Court, Tirana.
In the assessment of the Public Commissioner, in the present case, the investigation of the Independent […]
10 September 2018
The Public Commissioner was present at the Appeal Chamber to review the submitted appeal against the decision no. 5, dated, 23 March, 2018 of the Independent Qualification Commission, for the subject of re-evaluation Mrs. Mirela Fana,former member of the Supreme Court.
The Trial Panel of the Appeal Chamber, after verifying the presence of the […]
Decision No. 39/2018 Click here
Decision No. 30/2018 Click here
29 August 2018
The Public Commissioner appealed to the Appeal Chamber the decision no. 42, dated July 18, 2018 of the Independent Qualification Commission, for the re-evaluation subject Mrs. Antoneta Sevdari, prosecutor at the Tirana Prosecutor’s Office of the First Instance Court and candidate for membership at the High Prosecutorial Council.
In the assessment of the Public […]
Decision No. 36/2018 Click here
Decision No. 34/2018 Click here
Appeal date 29.08.2018 Click here
Elements of the case dated 13.02.2019 Click here
Elements of the case dated 19.02.2019 Click here
Elements of the case dated 25.02.2019 Click here
Elements of the case dated 11.3.2024 Click here
Elements of the case dated 17.4.2024 Click here
Final conclusions dated 23.4.2024 Click here
28 August 2018
The Public Commissioner appealed to the Appeal Chamber the decision No. 47, dated 25.07.2018, of the Independent Qualification Commission, for the subject of re-evaluation Mr. Astrit Faqolli, judge at the Tirana First Instance Court and candidate for membership at the High Judicial Council.
In the assessment of the Public Commissioner, in the present case, […]